非常抱歉,
你要访问的页面不存在,
非常抱歉,
你要访问的页面不存在,
非常抱歉,
你要访问的页面不存在,
验证码:
职称:Professor
所属学校:Johns Hopkins University
所属院系:BLOOMBERG SCHOOL of PUBLIC HEALTH
所属专业:Medicine
联系方式:410-955-7079
Social relations of scientific thought; history of biomedical and biological sciences; history of medicine and science in Russia. My interest in the history of science and medicine originated with my participation in numerous arguments about the Vietnam War in the 1960s and 1970s. I noticed that people rarely changed their minds during these heated debates, regardless of the factual arguments advanced. So, I became interested in the question “Why do people think what they think?” In college, I looked for an answer in philosophy, psychology, sociology, and, finally, history courses (which I found most satisfying). From history—particularly, Russian history—I found my way to History and Sociology of Science, which offered interesting approaches to a specific form of my question: “Why do scientists and physicians think what they think?” I’ve been working on that question for about three decades now, and still find it fascinating. In my first book, Darwin Without Malthus: The Struggle for Existence in Russian Evolutionary Thought (1989), I explored the ways in which social, cultural, and physico-geographical circumstances shaped the response of Russian naturalists to Darwin’s culturally-laden metaphor “struggle for existence,” and so imparted a characteristic direction to Russian evolutionary thought. Upon completion of this project, I wanted to explore the same general question for experimental science, and settled on a study of Ivan Pavlov. I was fortunate to begin that project in the early 1990s, when Gorbachev’s ‘glasnost’ was making available an avalanche of previously inaccessible archival materials. I embarked on what I conceived as a “scholarly biography accessible to the educated lay person.” By the mid-1990s, I realized that some of the questions that most animated me as a historian of science and medicine could not be addressed in satisfying depth and detail in the biography without losing my lay audience—and so took a “detour” to write a separate monograph on Pavlov’s laboratory and scientific research during the years 1891-1904, which generated the work on digestive physiology for which he won the Nobel Prize. Having completed that book, Pavlov's Physiology Factory: Experiment, Interpretation, Laboratory Enterprise (2002), I returned to the biography. That biography, Ivan Pavlov: A Russian Life in Science, is now available from Oxford University Press. I am now at the beginning stages of work with John Mann and Sergei Krasikov on a documentary film, Pavlov's Quest, about his life and science as a search for certainty in a tumultuous, uncertain world.
Daniel Todes's teaching relates to his central interest in the relationship of scientific and medical ideas to the context in which they are generated. Recent courses include "Analogy and Metaphor in Science and Medicine," "Experiment and the Laboratory in Science and Medicine," Lives in Science" (a survey of the history of science through contextualized biographies), "Squeezing the Data: Interpretation in Science and Medicine," "History of Modern Medicine: From Enlightenment to Present," "The White Plague: History of Tuberculosis," and "Biography"