请登录

记住密码
注册

请登录

记住密码
注册

操作失败

duang出错啦~~

非常抱歉,

你要访问的页面不存在,

操作失败

Sorry~~

非常抱歉,

你要访问的页面不存在,

提示

duang~~

非常抱歉,

你要访问的页面不存在,

提示

验证码:

Misha Becker

职称:Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies

所属学校:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

所属院系:Linguistics Department

所属专业:Linguistics

联系方式:919-962-1192

简介

My background is in syntactic theory and the acquisition of syntax, both morphosyntax and argument structure, in children (monolingual first language). I'm also interested in bilingualism, language revitalization, Specific Language Impairment, computational modeling of language learning, learnability theory, and experimental methodologies for studying implicit linguistic knowledge. For the past decade or so my research has focused on how children learn "displacing" predicates. These are verbs and adjectives that do not select an external argument (subject) and thus allow another NP to be "displaced" into the subject position. Displacing predicates include raising verbs (e.g. seem or appear), tough adjectives (easy), and unaccusative verbs (arrive). My main question is how children distinguish these predicates from control verbs (want or claim), control adjectives (eager), and unergative verbs (laugh). These are predicates that do select an external argument but occur in superficially similar sentence environments (e.g. John seems/claims to like pizza). The answer I have pursued is that NP animacy provides a crucial cue: encountering a predicate with an inanimate subject should tell learners that the predicate is a displacing predicate. In 2014 I published a book about how NP (in)animacy helps children acquire displacing predicates.

职业经历

My background is in syntactic theory and the acquisition of syntax, both morphosyntax and argument structure, in children (monolingual first language). I'm also interested in bilingualism, language revitalization, Specific Language Impairment, computational modeling of language learning, learnability theory, and experimental methodologies for studying implicit linguistic knowledge. For the past decade or so my research has focused on how children learn "displacing" predicates. These are verbs and adjectives that do not select an external argument (subject) and thus allow another NP to be "displaced" into the subject position. Displacing predicates include raising verbs (e.g. seem or appear), tough adjectives (easy), and unaccusative verbs (arrive). My main question is how children distinguish these predicates from control verbs (want or claim), control adjectives (eager), and unergative verbs (laugh). These are predicates that do select an external argument but occur in superficially similar sentence environments (e.g. John seems/claims to like pizza). The answer I have pursued is that NP animacy provides a crucial cue: encountering a predicate with an inanimate subject should tell learners that the predicate is a displacing predicate. In 2014 I published a book about how NP (in)animacy helps children acquire displacing predicates.

该专业其他教授